Harness IP
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 中國語
  • Client Login
  • 한국어
  • 日本語
  • 中國語

Blog

Subscribe to our Blogs

  • Subscribe to our Blogs

Harness IP takes pride in our collective knowledge of intellectual property law and how it affects businesses and organizations across a range of industries. We also enjoy keeping up with the latest decisions from the prominent venues that affect IP law, including the Federal Circuit, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the PTAB. Our goal is to distill this knowledge into practical guidance that in-house counsel and others can use. We invite you to join our audience and enrich the discussion whenever possible. 

  • Litigation

      ALL CATEGORIES

      • Biologics & Biosimilars
        • FDA Guidance & Updates
      • BioPharma
      • Blockchain, Crypto, & Web 3.0
      • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
      • EDMO Patent Updates
      • Fitness IP
      • IP Management
      • IPR-PGR
      • Litigation
      • Patent Prosecution
      • quIPs
      • Trademarks
      • Uncategorized
  • Authors
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 8
    • John A. Castellano, IIIJohn A. Castellano, III 1
    • Christopher M. CaubleChristopher M. Cauble 5
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 201
    • Keith P. DriscollKeith P. Driscoll 1
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 7
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 3
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 11
    • Charlie Franklin, Ph.D.Charlie Franklin, Ph.D. 1
    • Alexandra M. FuchsAlexandra M. Fuchs 2
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jordyn GraweJordyn Grawe 9
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Paul R. HofferPaul R. Hoffer 2
    • Michael P. KellaMichael P. Kella 3
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 11
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 2
    • J. Bradley (Brad) LuchsingerJ. Bradley (Brad) Luchsinger 1
    • Chris K. MillerChris K. Miller 1
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 35
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 18
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 16
    • Mark A. SpinelliMark A. Spinelli 1
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 4
    • David P. UtykanskiDavid P. Utykanski 1
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 3
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 4
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 719
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 12
    • Scott E. YackeyScott E. Yackey 1
  • Protecting-Your-Cannabis-Brands_Harness-IP

    January 2, 2025

    Navigating Complex Federal Regulations When Protecting Your Cannabis Brands

    More

  • FDA NIH | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

    December 16, 2024

    20 March 2024 USPTO Alert: USPTO ensures robust and reliable patents through examiner training on searching for prior art in FDA and NIH databases

    More

  • The 7 Things You Don’t Say (In Writing) When Your Company is Accused of Patent Infringement

    November 19, 2024

    The 7 Things You Don’t Say (In Writing) When Your Company is Accused of Patent Infringement

    More

  • Don’t Disclaim-Away the Broader Claims in Your Continuation

    November 19, 2024

    Don’t Disclaim-Away the Broader Claims in Your Continuation Patent Application

    More

  • Middle Market IP on NCMM Podcast

    November 19, 2024

    Joe Walsh and Bryan Wheelock Talk Middle Market IP on NCMM Podcast

    More

  • gaming assets Trademark Lawyer

    November 11, 2024

    “Trademark tactics for safeguarding gaming assets,” The Trademark Lawyer

    More

Harness Dickey IP Litigators e1559051363276 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

March 2, 2020

Federal Circuit Finds Lawyers Chose Advocacy over Candor

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP Patent Attorneys Dallas Detroit St. Louis Washington, DC

February 19, 2020

Licensee’s Failure to Mark Licensed Products Limits Patent Owner’s Recovery

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Intellectual Property Attorney Client Service All Stars | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

February 13, 2020

A Binding Settlement Agreement Generally Moots the Action Even if it Requires Future Performance

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Intellectual Property Law Blog

February 6, 2020

You Mess With Me, You Mess With My Whole (Patent) Family

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock court witness stand | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

February 5, 2020

Only an Expert Can Testify about What Would Be Obvious to a Non-Expert

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Trademark Litigation over Coffee | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

January 23, 2020

Affirmed: Patent Owner’s Claim Construction that Excluded Preferred Embodiments Was Not Correct

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

pen marker hand the hand 40554 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

January 10, 2020

Lack of Showing of Criticality Dooms Claims

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Chemical Patents

January 7, 2020

Markush Groups Open to Additional Elements

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

patent law litigation gavel | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

December 27, 2019

Inherency Supplied Missing Claim Limitation in Obviousness Analysis

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Litigators e1559051363276 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

December 26, 2019

Points of Difference from Prior Art Did Not Make it to the Claims; Claims were Anticipated

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Intellectual Property Law Blog

December 19, 2019

Award of Attorneys’ Fees Hinges on a Finding of an Exceptional Case, Not an Exceptional Part of a Case

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Presumption of Nexus Patent Litigation | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

December 18, 2019

Patent Owner’s Praise for Other Inventions Destroyed Presumption of Nexus between Commercial Product and Claims

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

map of the world 2401458 1920 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

December 18, 2019

It is Importation that Infringes under 35 USC § 271(g), Not Manufacture

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Cash from a mega verdict in patent litigation

December 16, 2019

Plaintiff Who Dismissed Patent Infringement Case Still Must Pay Defendant’s Attorneys’ Fees

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

patent law litigation gavel | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

December 16, 2019

Substantial Evidence Supported Jury Verdict that not all Infringing Uses were Reasonably Related to Developing and Submitting Information to the FDA

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Intellectual Property Litigation US Supreme Court | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

December 12, 2019

Yabba Dabba Don’t — “Bedrock Principle” Prevents USPTO from Recouping Attorneys Fees

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

law 1063249 1920 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

November 8, 2019

Board Erred in Finding Reference Was Not Reasonably Pertinent to the Problem Facing the Inventor

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Patent Law Prior Art | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

November 7, 2019

Petitioner Allowed to Supplement Evidence that Reference was Available

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP IP Litigation PTAB Proceedings

October 31, 2019

Federal Circuit Gives the PTAB an Inferiority Complex

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Pharma Patent Attorney Harness Dickey | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

October 30, 2019

Synthesizing and Screening Thousands of Candidate Compounds Constitutes Undue Experimentation

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 4 5 6 … 10 Load more posts

Stay Current on all things IP by subscribing to our blog

Join

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
    • Sitemap
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice
  • © 2025 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved. H D & P