Litigation | Harness Dickey

January 2, 2025

Navigating Complex Federal Regulations When Protecting Your Cannabis Brands

More
December 16, 2024

20 March 2024 USPTO Alert: USPTO ensures robust and reliable patents through examiner training on searching for prior art in FDA and NIH databases

More
November 19, 2024

The 7 Things You Don’t Say (In Writing) When Your Company is Accused of Patent Infringement

More
November 19, 2024

Don’t Disclaim-Away the Broader Claims in Your Continuation Patent Application

More
November 19, 2024

Joe Walsh and Bryan Wheelock Talk Middle Market IP on NCMM Podcast

More
November 11, 2024

“Trademark tactics for safeguarding gaming assets,” The Trademark Lawyer

More

August 11, 2011

CAFC MYRIAD DECISION: This is Not a “Gene Patent” Case

By:

June 17, 2011

Does the Federal Circuit “mean” it this time? Adding confusion to when claim language lacking the word “means” should be subject to means-plus-function analysis.

By:

June 17, 2011

A possibility among a limited number is not necessarily a predictable solution; teaching away need not be specific.

By:

June 10, 2011

Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, U.S., No. 10-290 (June 9, 2011).

By:

June 10, 2011

Stanford v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.

By:

June 2, 2011

Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB SA – The Supreme Court Addresses Inducement of Patent Infringement

By:

April 25, 2011

TiVo Inc. v. Echostar Corp.

By:

April 18, 2011

Federal Circuit Overturns Precedential BPAI Opinion, Allows Reissue Only to Add Dependent Claims

By:

April 8, 2011

Innovention Toys, LLC, V. MGA Entertainment, Inc.

By:

April 8, 2011

THE ORAL ARGUMENT IN MYRIAD, April 4th, 2011

By:

March 17, 2011

IS THE END IN SIGHT FOR PATENT MISMARKING CLAIMS?

By:

June 30, 2010

Bilski’s Claims Unpatentable Abstract Ideas; Machine-or-Transformation a Useful, Not Exclusive Test for Patentable Subject Matter

By:

June 21, 2010

Another Case (Surprisingly) of First Impression for the Federal Circuit

By:

May 11, 2010

“First Sale” Doctrine Does Not Apply When There Is a Likelihood of Post-Purchase Confusion

By:

February 22, 2010

Failure to Properly Preserve and Search for ESI Results in Monetary Sanctions and Spoliation Jury Instructions

By:

January 11, 2010

Wyeth v. Kappos

By:

December 9, 2009

Federal Circuit’s Holding that Patent Did Not Transfer to Plaintiff Prompts Dissent to Deliver a Lecture on Contract Law

By:

December 7, 2009

Federal Circuit Holds that Implied Assertions of Patent Rights are Sufficient to Give Rise to Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction

By:

December 2, 2009

Claims To Methods Of Managing Bulk E-Mail Distribution To Groups Of Targeted Consumers Obvious Based On “Common Sense”

By:

December 2, 2009

U.S. District Court For The Eastern District Of Texas Ordered To Transfer Venue

By: