Harness IP
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 中國語
  • Client Login
  • 한국어
  • 日本語
  • 中國語

Blog

Subscribe to our Blogs

  • Subscribe to our Blogs

Harness IP takes pride in our collective knowledge of intellectual property law and how it affects businesses and organizations across a range of industries. We also enjoy keeping up with the latest decisions from the prominent venues that affect IP law, including the Federal Circuit, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the PTAB. Our goal is to distill this knowledge into practical guidance that in-house counsel and others can use. We invite you to join our audience and enrich the discussion whenever possible. 

  • Patent Prosecution

      ALL CATEGORIES

      • Biologics & Biosimilars
        • FDA Guidance & Updates
      • BioPharma
      • Blockchain, Crypto, & Web 3.0
      • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
      • EDMO Patent Updates
      • Fitness IP
      • IP Management
      • IPR-PGR
      • Litigation
      • Patent Prosecution
      • quIPs
      • Trademarks
      • Uncategorized
  • Authors
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 8
    • John A. Castellano, IIIJohn A. Castellano, III 1
    • Christopher M. CaubleChristopher M. Cauble 5
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 201
    • Keith P. DriscollKeith P. Driscoll 1
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 7
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 3
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 11
    • Charlie Franklin, Ph.D.Charlie Franklin, Ph.D. 1
    • Alexandra M. FuchsAlexandra M. Fuchs 2
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jordyn GraweJordyn Grawe 9
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Paul R. HofferPaul R. Hoffer 2
    • Michael P. KellaMichael P. Kella 3
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 11
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 2
    • J. Bradley (Brad) LuchsingerJ. Bradley (Brad) Luchsinger 1
    • Chris K. MillerChris K. Miller 1
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 35
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 18
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 16
    • Mark A. SpinelliMark A. Spinelli 1
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 4
    • David P. UtykanskiDavid P. Utykanski 1
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 3
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 4
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 719
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 12
    • Scott E. YackeyScott E. Yackey 1
  • Protecting-Your-Cannabis-Brands_Harness-IP

    January 2, 2025

    Navigating Complex Federal Regulations When Protecting Your Cannabis Brands

    More

  • FDA NIH | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

    December 16, 2024

    20 March 2024 USPTO Alert: USPTO ensures robust and reliable patents through examiner training on searching for prior art in FDA and NIH databases

    More

  • The 7 Things You Don’t Say (In Writing) When Your Company is Accused of Patent Infringement

    November 19, 2024

    The 7 Things You Don’t Say (In Writing) When Your Company is Accused of Patent Infringement

    More

  • Don’t Disclaim-Away the Broader Claims in Your Continuation

    November 19, 2024

    Don’t Disclaim-Away the Broader Claims in Your Continuation Patent Application

    More

  • Middle Market IP on NCMM Podcast

    November 19, 2024

    Joe Walsh and Bryan Wheelock Talk Middle Market IP on NCMM Podcast

    More

  • gaming assets Trademark Lawyer

    November 11, 2024

    “Trademark tactics for safeguarding gaming assets,” The Trademark Lawyer

    More

May 5, 2017

Estoppel Under 317(b) Always Applies on a Claim by Claim Basis, Just Like the Statute Says

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock 207063067 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

May 1, 2017

A Sale Is Still a Sale under the AIA

By: Jennifer M. Woodside Wojtala, Principal

April 28, 2017

Lack of Proof That Infringement was “But For” Cause of Lost Sales or Price Erosion Defeats Permanent Injunction

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP IP Attorneys

April 28, 2017

A Claim to an Abstract Idea does not Automatically Become Eligible Merely by Adding a Mathematical Formula

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock court with gavel | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

April 21, 2017

§317(b) Resurrects Claims Invalidated in Reexamination, That Were Found Not Invalid in Litigation

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock 240614686 small e1453910269364 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

April 19, 2017

IPR Estoppel: Ripe for Gamesmanship?

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP Intellectual Property Attorneys

April 19, 2017

Little Words That Can Make a Big Difference: i.e. Versus e.g.

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

April 17, 2017

Issue Preclusion: Patent Owner Does Not Get a Do Over to Assert the Claims Against Similar Products

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock court with gavel | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

April 17, 2017

Failure of Licensee to Mark May Upend $15.7 Million Damage Award

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

April 13, 2017

An Omitted Inventor Can’t Correct Inventorship of a Patent Owned by a Government Agency

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock 137408126 Binders in Laptop | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

April 13, 2017

Trust but Verify – When Speculation and Assertion Are Not Enough

By:

Harness IP Intellectual Property Lawyers

April 12, 2017

Just Because the Board Didn’t Say It, Doesn’t Mean that the Board Didn’t Think It

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Confused Business Man | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

April 11, 2017

When is a Missing Feature Not There?

By:

shutterstock court with gavel | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

April 7, 2017

Don’t Exalt Slogans over Real Meaning; Find the Claim Construction that Naturally Aligns with the Specification and Prosecution History

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock 240614686 small e1453910269364 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

April 2, 2017

Dependent Claims Were Anticipated While Independent Claims Were Not

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

March 27, 2017

Prior Art that Must be Distorted from its Obvious Design Does Not Anticipate

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP Intellectual Property Lawyers

March 23, 2017

Inventorship Claims That Took $8 Million to Defeat Were Not “Exceptional”

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock late dice | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

March 21, 2017

Patent Owner Cannot Create New Claim Construction Issues After the Jury Verdict

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

March 21, 2017

Sit Back, Make the Popcorn, and Watch: Patent Owners, You Have Six Years to Bring Your Infringement Claim

By:

March 17, 2017

An Objectively Reasonable Case Can Still be Exceptional

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 10 11 12 … 23 Load more posts

Stay Current on all things IP by subscribing to our blog

Join

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
    • Sitemap
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice

  • © 2026 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved. H D & P