Harness IP
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 中國語
  • Client Login
  • 한국어
  • 日本語
  • 中國語

Blog

Subscribe to our Blogs

  • Subscribe to our Blogs

Harness IP takes pride in our collective knowledge of intellectual property law and how it affects businesses and organizations across a range of industries. We also enjoy keeping up with the latest decisions from the prominent venues that affect IP law, including the Federal Circuit, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the PTAB. Our goal is to distill this knowledge into practical guidance that in-house counsel and others can use. We invite you to join our audience and enrich the discussion whenever possible. 

  • Patent Prosecution

      ALL CATEGORIES

      • Biologics & Biosimilars
        • FDA Guidance & Updates
      • BioPharma
      • Blockchain, Crypto, & Web 3.0
      • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
      • EDMO Patent Updates
      • Fitness IP
      • IP Management
      • IPR-PGR
      • Litigation
      • Patent Prosecution
      • quIPs
      • Trademarks
      • Uncategorized
  • Authors
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 8
    • John A. Castellano, IIIJohn A. Castellano, III 1
    • Christopher M. CaubleChristopher M. Cauble 5
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 201
    • Keith P. DriscollKeith P. Driscoll 1
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 7
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 3
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 11
    • Charlie Franklin, Ph.D.Charlie Franklin, Ph.D. 1
    • Alexandra M. FuchsAlexandra M. Fuchs 2
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jordyn GraweJordyn Grawe 9
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Paul R. HofferPaul R. Hoffer 2
    • Michael P. KellaMichael P. Kella 3
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 11
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 2
    • J. Bradley (Brad) LuchsingerJ. Bradley (Brad) Luchsinger 1
    • Chris K. MillerChris K. Miller 1
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 35
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 18
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 16
    • Mark A. SpinelliMark A. Spinelli 1
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 4
    • David P. UtykanskiDavid P. Utykanski 1
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 3
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 4
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 719
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 12
    • Scott E. YackeyScott E. Yackey 1
  • Protecting-Your-Cannabis-Brands_Harness-IP

    January 2, 2025

    Navigating Complex Federal Regulations When Protecting Your Cannabis Brands

    More

  • FDA NIH | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

    December 16, 2024

    20 March 2024 USPTO Alert: USPTO ensures robust and reliable patents through examiner training on searching for prior art in FDA and NIH databases

    More

  • The 7 Things You Don’t Say (In Writing) When Your Company is Accused of Patent Infringement

    November 19, 2024

    The 7 Things You Don’t Say (In Writing) When Your Company is Accused of Patent Infringement

    More

  • Don’t Disclaim-Away the Broader Claims in Your Continuation

    November 19, 2024

    Don’t Disclaim-Away the Broader Claims in Your Continuation Patent Application

    More

  • Middle Market IP on NCMM Podcast

    November 19, 2024

    Joe Walsh and Bryan Wheelock Talk Middle Market IP on NCMM Podcast

    More

  • gaming assets Trademark Lawyer

    November 11, 2024

    “Trademark tactics for safeguarding gaming assets,” The Trademark Lawyer

    More

shutterstock 207063067 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

January 24, 2018

Drag Things Out? Disclaimer Creates Estoppel.

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP IP Litigation PTAB Proceedings

January 12, 2018

The Ultimate Reasonable Royalty Award Must be Based on the Incremental Value that the Patented Invention Adds

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP Patent Attorneys Dallas Detroit St. Louis Washington, DC

January 10, 2018

Five Common Myths about Utility Patents for Start-ups

By: Christopher M. Cauble, Principal

Harness IP Software Patents

January 10, 2018

Software Innovations Make Non-Abstract Improvements to Computer Technology

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP Intellectual Property Attorneys

January 10, 2018

Patent Prosecution Word of the Day: “Infundibuliform”

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP Intellectual Property Lawyers

January 8, 2018

Director’s Time-Bar Determinations under § 315(b) are not Exempt from Judicial Review

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP Supreme Court IP Litigation

January 5, 2018

The Board Says that IPRs are Adjudicatory Proceedings — What will the Supreme Court Say?

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP IP Litigation PTAB Proceedings

January 5, 2018

About “About”: “Less Than About 3%” Includes 4%

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP Intellectual Property Lawyers

December 29, 2017

Anticipation Analysis Indisputably Allows for Some Flexibility; Substantial Evidence Still Supports Finding of No Anticipation

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP IP Attorneys St. Louis

December 28, 2017

One More Dribble from Aqua

By:

Video Game IP Attorney

December 28, 2017

iLife is Full of Un-Nintendo-ed Consequences

By:

Harness IP IP Attorneys

December 26, 2017

If You Try to Hide Prosecution Conduct, Then the Court will Presume You Had Something to Hide

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP IP Litigation PTAB Proceedings

December 22, 2017

Aqua Holds Water; Board’s Denial of Motion to Amend Vacated Because Board Improperly Put Burden on Patent Owner

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP IP Litigation St. Louis

December 20, 2017

Whether Third Party Acts are Attributable to Infringer in a Divided Infringement Situation is Question of Fact

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

044837842 santa claus canberra airport c | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

December 20, 2017

Dear Santa … A Patent Law Wish List for 2018

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP patent Attorneys Detroit St. Louis Dallas Washington, DC

December 18, 2017

Federal Circuit Affirms Board on Claim Construction, No Anticipation, and Nonobviousness

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP Intellectual Property Attorneys

December 14, 2017

No Need to be your Own Lexicographer

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock court with gavel | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

December 8, 2017

Patent Owner Has Burden to Prove Marking Once Infringer Identifies Unmarked Products

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock 363324194 Trade Secret NDA small | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

December 5, 2017

Obviousness v. Anticipation: That Which Doesn’t Disclose Still Could Teach

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock 207063067 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

November 21, 2017

Intervening Rights Apply When There Is a Product that Infringes the Original Claim that Does Not Infringe the Amended Claim

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 5 6 7 … 23 Load more posts

Stay Current on all things IP by subscribing to our blog

Join

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
    • Sitemap
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice
  • © 2026 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved. H D & P