Harness IP
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 中國語
  • Client Login
  • 한국어
  • 日本語
  • 中國語

Blog

Subscribe to our Blogs

  • Subscribe to our Blogs

Harness IP takes pride in our collective knowledge of intellectual property law and how it affects businesses and organizations across a range of industries. We also enjoy keeping up with the latest decisions from the prominent venues that affect IP law, including the Federal Circuit, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the PTAB. Our goal is to distill this knowledge into practical guidance that in-house counsel and others can use. We invite you to join our audience and enrich the discussion whenever possible. 

  • All Categories

      ALL CATEGORIES

      • Biologics & Biosimilars
        • FDA Guidance & Updates
      • BioPharma
      • Blockchain, Crypto, & Web 3.0
      • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
      • EDMO Patent Updates
      • Fitness IP
      • IP Management
      • IPR-PGR
      • Litigation
      • Patent Prosecution
      • quIPs
      • Trademarks
      • Uncategorized
  • Authors
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 8
    • John A. Castellano, IIIJohn A. Castellano, III 1
    • Christopher M. CaubleChristopher M. Cauble 5
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 201
    • Keith P. DriscollKeith P. Driscoll 1
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 7
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 3
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 11
    • Charlie Franklin, Ph.D.Charlie Franklin, Ph.D. 1
    • Alexandra M. FuchsAlexandra M. Fuchs 2
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jordyn GraweJordyn Grawe 9
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Paul R. HofferPaul R. Hoffer 2
    • Michael P. KellaMichael P. Kella 3
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 11
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 2
    • J. Bradley (Brad) LuchsingerJ. Bradley (Brad) Luchsinger 1
    • Chris K. MillerChris K. Miller 1
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 35
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 18
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 16
    • Mark A. SpinelliMark A. Spinelli 1
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 4
    • David P. UtykanskiDavid P. Utykanski 1
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 3
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 4
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 719
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 12
    • Scott E. YackeyScott E. Yackey 1
  • Protecting-Your-Cannabis-Brands_Harness-IP

    January 2, 2025

    Navigating Complex Federal Regulations When Protecting Your Cannabis Brands

    More

  • FDA NIH | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

    December 16, 2024

    20 March 2024 USPTO Alert: USPTO ensures robust and reliable patents through examiner training on searching for prior art in FDA and NIH databases

    More

  • The 7 Things You Don’t Say (In Writing) When Your Company is Accused of Patent Infringement

    November 19, 2024

    The 7 Things You Don’t Say (In Writing) When Your Company is Accused of Patent Infringement

    More

  • Don’t Disclaim-Away the Broader Claims in Your Continuation

    November 19, 2024

    Don’t Disclaim-Away the Broader Claims in Your Continuation Patent Application

    More

  • Middle Market IP on NCMM Podcast

    November 19, 2024

    Joe Walsh and Bryan Wheelock Talk Middle Market IP on NCMM Podcast

    More

  • gaming assets Trademark Lawyer

    November 11, 2024

    “Trademark tactics for safeguarding gaming assets,” The Trademark Lawyer

    More

August 18, 2011

The Cost of Sloppy Claim Drafting

By:

August 11, 2011

CAFC MYRIAD DECISION: This is Not a “Gene Patent” Case

By:

July 26, 2011

USPTO Proposes Amending Rule 1.56 To Define Materiality In Accordance With Therasense

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

July 20, 2011

Launch of .XXX Domain Names – Blocking Registration of Trademarks as Domains

By:

June 17, 2011

Does the Federal Circuit “mean” it this time? Adding confusion to when claim language lacking the word “means” should be subject to means-plus-function analysis.

By:

June 17, 2011

A possibility among a limited number is not necessarily a predictable solution; teaching away need not be specific.

By:

June 10, 2011

Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, U.S., No. 10-290 (June 9, 2011).

By:

June 10, 2011

Stanford v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.

By:

June 2, 2011

Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB SA – The Supreme Court Addresses Inducement of Patent Infringement

By:

May 27, 2011

Therasense’s Stringent Inequitable Conduct Test

By:

May 4, 2011

TTAB: Prompt Filing of Supplemental Response Cures Procedural Deficiency in Expert Disclosures

By:

April 25, 2011

TiVo Inc. v. Echostar Corp.

By:

April 22, 2011

Providing Support for Generous Construction of a Claimed Range

By:

April 18, 2011

Federal Circuit Overturns Precedential BPAI Opinion, Allows Reissue Only to Add Dependent Claims

By:

April 15, 2011

Harness IP Ranks in Top 5 of U.S. Patent Firms

By:

April 8, 2011

Innovention Toys, LLC, V. MGA Entertainment, Inc.

By:

April 8, 2011

THE ORAL ARGUMENT IN MYRIAD, April 4th, 2011

By:

April 7, 2011

The Sin of Synonyms

By:

April 6, 2011

USPTO Announces Implementation of Track One

By:

March 17, 2011

IS THE END IN SIGHT FOR PATENT MISMARKING CLAIMS?

By:

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 56 57 58 59 Load more posts

Stay Current on all things IP by subscribing to our blog

Join

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
    • Sitemap
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice

  • © 2026 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved. H D & P